Supreme Court To Decide Tulsa Religious Bias Case Over Hijab


Thursday, October 2nd 2014, 11:18 am
By: News On 6


The Supreme Court said Thursday it will consider whether retailer Abercrombie & Fitch discriminated against a Muslim woman in Tulsa who was denied a job because her head scarf conflicted with the company's dress code, which the clothing chain has since changed.

The justices agreed to hear the Obama administration's appeal of a lower court decision that ruled the New Albany, Ohio-based company did not discriminate because the job applicant did not specifically say she needed a religious accommodation.

At issue is how employers must deal with laws that require them to make allowances for a worker's religious practices, as long as doing so does not cause the business too much hardship.

A federal judge in Tulsa initially sided with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, which sued on behalf of Samantha Elauf. The agency alleged Elauf wasn't hired at a Tulsa store in 2008 because her hijab violated Abercrombie's "look policy," described at the time as a "classic East Coast collegiate style."

7/20/2011 Related Story: Abercrombie & Fitch Lawsuit Winner Says She Sued For All Muslim Girls

But the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reversed that decision. The appeals court said Elauf never directly informed her interviewer she needed a religious accommodation, even though she was wearing the head scarf during her interview.

Abercrombie, which has faced slumping sales and could face negative publicity in the case, has pressed on with its defense, saying it was Elauf's obligation to explain any special needs based on her religion. 


"There is no reason why a Muslim girl should go to a job interview worrying about the fact that they wear a head scarf," Samantha Elauf told News On 6.

The company has settled two other EEOC discrimination lawsuits over the same issue and it changed its "look policy" four years ago to allow its workers to wear hijabs.

In their brief for the EEOC, government lawyers said the appeals court ruling undercuts legal protection for religious practices because it unfairly places the entire the burden on the job applicant to raise the issue. Sometimes job applicants aren't aware of a potential conflict between a religious practice and a company policy, the government said.

In this case, the EEOC says Elauf never requested an accommodation because she didn't know about the "look policy." The agency also claims that Abercrombie was clearly on notice that Elauf needed to wear the head scarf for religious reasons, or else it wouldn't have denied her a job.

In 2013, the company settled two other EEOC discrimination suits filed in California. In one case, a judge determined the company fired a Muslim worker from a California store, while another judge said it refused to hire another woman in the state because of her refusal to remove the hijab during work.

The court will hear arguments next year in Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., 14-86.


The Associated Press contributed to this report.