WASHINGTON (AP) _ The Bush administration defended embattled World Bank President Paul Wolfowitz on Tuesday, saying findings that he broke bank rules in arranging a hefty pay package for his girlfriend did not amount to a firing offense.
Wolfowitz, who maintain that he acted in good faith, is waging a vigorous fight to keep running the institution. He will try to defend himself before the bank's 24-member board late Tuesday. The board, whose proceedings are carried out behind closed doors, ultimately will decide what actions to take against him.
Board members have discussed a range of disciplinary options. It could fire Wolfowitz, ask him to resign, signal that it lacks confidence in his leadership or reprimand him. Board members have been leaning toward an expression of no confidence or other tough language that would make it difficult _ if not impossible _ for Wolfowitz to stay on.
At the White House, spokesman Tony Snow said he did not think Wolfowitz has done anything to warrant his resignation.
Snow said that President Bush continues to support Wolfowitz, who had served as the No. 2 official at the Pentagon and was an architect of the U.S.-led war in Iraq before taking over the bank nearly two years ago.
``What we've said is, yeah, he made mistakes,'' Snow said. ``That pretty much is obvious. On the other hand, it's not a firing offense.''
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson also said they don't think the facts merit Wolfowitz's dismissal.
``It doesn't seem to be the kind of thing that you would want to see the dismissal of the World Bank president over,'' Rice said. ``I hope it will be resolved in a way that is true to what really happened there but also strengthens the bank, which is a really important institution,'' she added.
The controversy that has put Wolfowitz's job in jeopardy involves his handling of the 2005 compensation package for his girlfriend, Shaha Riza, a bank employee.
A special bank panel, in a report released late Monday, concluded that Wolfowitz broke bank rules in his handling of the pay package. It said the board must consider whether Wolfowitz ``will be able to provide the leadership'' to ensure that the bank achieves its mission of fighting poverty around the world.
In a response, Wolfowitz said, ``It is highly unfair and unwarranted to now find that I engaged in a conflict of interest because I relied on the advice of the ethics committee as best I understood it.''
The special panel acknowledged that the informal advice provided by the bank's ethics committee ``was not a model of clarity.''
But it also said that Wolfowitz's involvement in the details of Riza's salary ``went beyond the informal advice'' given by the ethics committee and that he ``engaged in a de facto conflict of interest.''
Under Wolfowitz's contract as well as the code of conduct for board officials, he was required to avoid any conflict of interest, the report said.
Riza worked for the bank before Wolfowitz took over as president in June 2005. She was moved to the State Department to avoid a conflict of interest, but stayed on the bank's payroll. Her salary went from close to $133,000 to $180,000. With subsequent raises, it eventually rose to $193,590.
European members are pushing for Wolfowitz to resign. The United States is the bank's largest shareholder. Bush tapped Wolfowitz for the job, a move that was approved by the bank's board.
The White House's Snow said Wolfowitz has said that he is willing to sit down with members of the bank to ``try to figure out the proper way to serve the best interests of the institution.''
Snow rejected the notion that the White House might be trying to convey a message that although the administration supports Wolfowitz, it is concerned that his continued tenure could damage the institution.
``No, so we're not trying to send a sort of clever, wink-wink, nudge-nudge signal,'' Snow said. ``It is, obviously, a serious concern.''
Treasury Department spokeswoman Brookly McLaughlin said, ``A clear reading of the facts in this report demonstrates that this was a unique situation, missteps occurred on all sides and communication may not have been clear enough.''
She added: ``the facts reveal that President Wolfowitz acted to find a pragmatic solution and to carry out the direction he received from the ethics committee.''