Study: Language-related gene established within past 200,000 years

<br>A gene linked to language became widely established in the human population within the last 200,000 years, perhaps because it helped people communicate better and survive, researchers said. <br><br>While

Wednesday, August 14th 2002, 12:00 am

By: News On 6

A gene linked to language became widely established in the human population within the last 200,000 years, perhaps because it helped people communicate better and survive, researchers said.

While the FOXP2 gene is not believed to have caused speech to emerge, it probably allowed humans to speak much more clearly, said study author Svante Paabo, a researcher at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany.

Researchers found the human version of the gene is different from its counterpart in other species, showing changes that may have contributed to our language abilities.

``We had communication of a sort, and then this change happened and allowed the carriers to articulate much better. This may have been the time we arrived at truly modern, articulate language,'' Paabo said. ``It sort of, I believe, fine-tuned our speech.''

A mutated form of the gene was linked last year to a speech disorder that impairs movement of the mouth, lips and tongue and problems such as use of the wrong word tense.

The researchers compared forms of the gene in mice, humans, chimpanzees, orangutans, gorillas and rhesus macaques, and found small differences, the researchers report Wednesday in a paper published online by the journal Nature.

Two spots in the human gene differed from the chimpanzee, gorilla and macaque forms, and three differed from the orangutan, the researchers found.

Precisely how the human gene affects language has not been determined other than its link to the speech disorder.

Todd Disotell, an associate professor of anthropology at New York University, said the link between the gene and the emergence of language in humans has not been proven.

``The best analogy I can give is that we know of a gene responsible for muscular dystrophy and that affects how you walk. Because some people have that mutation, does that make it the gene for walking? No,'' Disotell said.

``It's probably related, but it might be loosely related. Until we get a lot more data, we are not going to be able to answer that.''

Paabo said more needs to be known about the gene's function.

``People might say if we put this in a chimpanzee, it could talk. I don't think that is the case, speech is more complex than that,'' Paabo said.

Whatever its function, the gene became widely established within the last 200,000 years, the researchers concluded after comparing DNA from humans across the globe. By looking at the area around the gene, the researchers found very little variation, and what variation they did find indicated recent evolutionary change, said Anthony Monaco, a co-author of the study.

That time is well after the split between the evolutionary lineages of modern humans and Neanderthals, Paabo said.

The widespread adoption of the FOXP2 gene fits a scenario under which the expansion of the population of modern humans would be driven by the appearance of a more-proficient spoken language, the researchers said.

The earliest anatomically modern human first appeared no more than 125,000 years ago, said Eric Delson, a paleoanthropology professor at Lehman College of the City University of New York.

If the gene was established before that, it would have been in what can be ``broadly termed archaic Homo sapiens, ... some individuals of which by that time were in some ways beginning to look like modern humans, but not very much,'' said Delson, who was not involved in the study.

Paabo said those who first had the gene may have had a survival advantage because their improved communication abilities may have allowed them to hunt better, for example.

``Or tell nice stories to the girls. Or sing beautifully, maybe,'' Paabo said.

A version of the gene also has been found in birds, said co-author Wolfgang Enard, also at the Planck institute. Whether other communicative species, such as whales, share the gene has not been determined, Paabo said.