Homeland security nominee apologizes after withdrawing from consideration
Saturday, December 11th 2004, 3:16 pm
By: News On 6
WASHINGTON (AP) _ The White House renewed its search for a homeland security chief Saturday as the candidate President Bush thought ideal apologized for an immigration problem involving a family housekeeper that forced him to withdraw.
``I owe the president ... a great apology that this may have caused him and his administration a big distraction,'' Bernard Kerik said in a telephone interview with The Associated Press.
Speaking from his home in Franklin Lakes, N.J., the 49-year-old Kerik said he had discovered a few days ago that he did not pay all required taxes for a family nanny-housekeeper and that the woman may have been in the country illegally.
The surprise withdrawal by the former New York City police commissioner sent Bush back in search of a nominee to head the sprawling Department of Homeland Security, which was created after Sept. 11, 2001, to improve coordination and protection against future terrorist attacks.
On Saturday, former New York mayor Rudy Giuliani, who has been mentioned as a possible choice, expressed no interest in the job. ``I am not a candidate,'' he told reporters in New York.
Sen. Susan Collins, who heads the Senate committee that will take up the nomination, said she was confident Bush ``will move swiftly to find a replacement.''
Collins, R-Maine, said two ``terrific choices'' would be Asa Hutchinson, the department's assistant secretary, or Sen. Joe Lieberman, D-Conn.
Among the names that had been circulating for the post before Kerik's selection on Dec. 3 were Joe Allbaugh, former director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency; Mike Leavitt, former Utah governor and now head of the Environmental Protection Agency; and White House homeland security adviser Fran Townsend.
``We will certainly work to name someone as quickly as possible,'' White House spokeswoman Claire Buchan said Saturday.
Meanwhile, questions continue over how the White House review process could have missed the kind of ``nanny problem'' that scuttled high-level appointments in both the Clinton administration and the first Bush administration.
``There's a standard vetting process that we go through with all nominees and certainly we did that'' with Kerik, Buchan said. She said it was solely Kerik's decision to withdraw late Friday.
Bush, leaving a Maryland hospital after his annual physical Saturday, ignored a question about Kerik's withdrawal.
Giuliani, a close friend of Kerik's, said Bush administration officials asked Kerik from the beginning whether there were any issues involving domestic employees.
``He didn't think he had a problem,'' Giuliani. ``He made a mistake.''
Because the issued involved immigration _ and the Homeland Security Department includes the immigration agency _ Kerik had no choice but to withdraw, Giuliani said. ``Every time immigration issue came up this would be a problem.''
``It would have been a bitter, difficult battle that probably would have ended without him getting confirmed,'' Giuliani said.
In the AP interview, Kerik said that on Wednesday _ five days after Bush announced his selection _ he discovered financial records ``that led me to question'' whether proper taxes had been paid for the housekeeper. By Friday, he said, ``I came to realize ... there may have been a question with regard to her legal status in the country.''
Since his nomination was announced, other issues have surfaced indicting that Kerik's confirmation by the Senate might not have gone smoothly.
Some lawmakers have questioned whether Kerik had the management experience to oversee the department, which has 80,000 employees.
Democrats also focused on potential conflict of interest issues because of Kerik's recent $6.2 million windfall from exercising stock options in a stun gun company that does business with the federal department.
According to a report in Newsweek, Kerik also was involved in a civil dispute six years ago after he failed to pay maintenance fees on a New Jersey condominium he owned. At one point an arrest warrant was issued, the magazine said.
Kerik on Saturday denied an arrest warrant was ever issued, but that he had been ordered to appear at a foreclosure hearing. ``The lawsuit was settled, the apartment was not foreclosed on,'' he added.