Harvard study finds economic cost of cell phone accidents equals benefit of calls on the road

WASHINGTON (AP) _ Harvard researchers estimate about one in 20 U.S. traffic accidents involve a driver talking on a cell phone, but say laws banning cellular phone use while driving would cost society

Monday, December 2nd 2002, 12:00 am

By: News On 6


WASHINGTON (AP) _ Harvard researchers estimate about one in 20 U.S. traffic accidents involve a driver talking on a cell phone, but say laws banning cellular phone use while driving would cost society about as much as they would save.

Data on the number of crashes caused by cell phones is incomplete, said the study released Monday by the Harvard Center for Risk Analysis. But it suggested that drivers talking on their phones are responsible for about 6 percent of U.S. auto accidents each year, killing an estimated 2,600 people and injuring 330,000 others.

The figure was reached using current cell phone usage estimates to update a 1997 study. That study looked at phone records of Canadian drivers involved in crashes to see if they were making calls at the time.

The cell phone industry found fault with the projections and their connection to wireless phones.

``It's sort of assumptions built on assumptions,'' said Kimberly Kuo, spokeswoman for the Cellular Telecommunications & Internet Association. ``There are not a lot of substantial findings that allow us to make policy conclusions.''

The Harvard study also found that the value people place on being able to call from the road roughly equals the accidents' cost. Previous studies _ including one done by the same Harvard center two years ago _ have showed the benefit of car calls outweighed the toll from such accidents _ medical bills and property damage, for example.

Joshua Cohen, lead author of the study, said while an individual has a small risk of being in an accident caused by a driver who is talking on the phone, there is a growing public health risk from increasing cell phone use. The number of cell phone subscribers has grown from 94 million at the time of the center's 2000 study to more than 128 million today.

At the same time, Cohen urged careful consideration when deciding whether to ban cell phone usage.

``People place a value on these calls, so just wiping out the phone calls and saying we are going to ban them, that's not something that should be taken lightly,'' he said.

The Harvard researchers calculated the costs associated with accidents caused by cell phones, such as medical bills and loss of life. The costs added up to an estimated $43 billion a year _ about the same as the researchers arrived at for the value that cell phone owners put on their phones.

Cell phone owners cited benefits such as security and peace of mind for instant communication, increased productivity, privacy and quicker crime and accident reporting.

New York state banned driver cell phone use for drivers use in June 2001. Six other states have some regulation of in-vehicle use of cell phones, ranging from a one-hand-on-the-steering-wheel rule to prohibiting school bus drivers from using a phone.

Felix Ortiz, a New York assemblyman who fought for six years to pass the ban, is helping lawmakers elsewhere write similar legislation.

``Whether they say I'm crazy or they harass me, you know what? I think I am doing the right thing for the public safety and for the quality of life,'' he said.

The Harvard study found that a cell phone user has about 13 chances in 1 million of being killed in an accident while making a call; that compares with 49 in 1 million for someone driving without a seat belt.

Other drivers and pedestrians have about four chances in 1 million of dying in an accident caused by a cell phone user, according to the study. Their chance of being killed by a drunken driver is more than four times as high _ 18 in a million.

The statistics are based on an average cell phone owner using 600 minutes a year.

Harvard's statistics update a center study released two years ago that estimated the chance of being killed while driving and talking on a cell phone were about six in a million and 1.5 in a million for other people on the road.

The original study was financed by the center and a grant from AT&T. The second phase was paid for solely by the center, which is supported by money from government, academia and individuals and private companies, including some automakers and insurers.

The original study found that the costs saved by a cell phone ban would be $2 billion, compared with about $25 billion in benefits lost, meaning a cell phone ban would have a loss to society of about $23 billion.

Cohen said the figures changed because more people are using cell phones, and they have better estimates of accidents caused by cell phone use, including those not reported to authorities.
logo

Get The Daily Update!

Be among the first to get breaking news, weather, and general news updates from News on 6 delivered right to your inbox!

More Like This

December 2nd, 2002

September 29th, 2024

September 17th, 2024

July 4th, 2024

Top Headlines

December 11th, 2024

December 11th, 2024

December 11th, 2024

December 11th, 2024