Quest for solvency leads to more fees for once-free services
Saturday, May 5th 2001, 12:00 am
By: News On 6
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) _ The dot-com wipeout that obliterated stock market fortunes is now starting to chip away at consumers' pocketbooks: Web sites are increasingly charging for information and services they once provided for free.
A free-to-fee evolution now permeates the Internet, from regional sites like the Web edition of Rochester, Minn.'s hometown paper to heavily trafficked sites such as Yahoo!, Major League Baseball, Salon.com and online telephone directory 555-1212.com.
Even FreeEdgar, a storehouse of financial documents filed by publicly held companies, is charging for some services.
``Some people think everything on the Internet should be free, but those people are in for a surprise. There aren't going to be many Web sites that aren't charging in the future if they want to stick around,'' predicted PhotoPoint.com CEO Ed Bernstein.
San Francisco-based PhotoPoint, a digital photography site with 1.6 million members, recently began charging $19.95 to $29.95 per year to use its formerly free online service for posting and sharing photos.
``Tens of thousands'' of PhotoPoint members already have sent in money to subscribe, Bernstein said.
Many of those subscribers received a $9.95 promotional subscription that PhotoPoint initially offered to existing members like Lori Hitchcock, a graduate student at the University of Indiana who stores digital photos on the site.
``I was dismayed when I found out about the fee. I paid it for this year, but I probably won't pay it again next year,'' said Hitchcock, 34. ``A site is going to have something that really knocks my socks off to get my money.''
The pressure to charge Web surfers is the next logical step in a no-nonsense environment where online advertising revenue has dried up. These businesses must either show a profit or face extinction, dot-com entrepreneurs and analysts say.
``It's going to take some time, but it has to be done,'' said online analyst Alan Alper of Gomez.com, an e-commerce research firm.
``The biggest challenge that these sites are going to face is trying to change the consumer mindset,'' he added. ``It's hard to charge for something once you have been giving it away for free.''
Most Web sites are trying to ease visitors into paying by offering a limited amount of service for free before demanding money. San Francisco-based 555-1212.com, for instance, lets its registered users search for up to 30 phone numbers per month before imposing fees.
``If people see they are getting value out of a service, they are more willing to pay for it,'' said 555-1212.com CEO Pamela Roussos. ``We are taking a risk (by charging), but it's a calculated risk. The business model we had before was quite ludicrous.''
For some entrepreneurs weary of the upside-down economics that prevailed in e-commerce's early days, the fee phenomenon is a refreshing dose of financial reality.
``Now, we are all going to have to survive on our own merits,'' said Homestead.com CEO Justin Kitch. Menlo Park-based Homestead creates Web sites; it recently imposed a $29.95 monthly fee aimed at small business owners.
For Web surfers accustomed to a free ride, the proliferation of new fee-based services will force tough decisions.
``I'm torn. I can see why some of these sites have to charge, but I still feel like information on the Internet should be free. I have always thought of it as the world's public library,'' said Ashley Highsmith of Austin, Texas.
Highsmith, 23, so far has resisted the Web's fee push during her roughly 20 hours of weekly online usage.
Persuading Web surfers to pay for once-free services will require enticements.
Salon.com, a San Francisco-based online magazine desperate for more revenue, recently introduced a premium service that includes features unavailable on the free site, including ``erotic'' art and photography and a daily column on the U.S. president entitled ``Bushed!''.
Salon's management thinks it can raise as much as $1.8 million annually from $30-a-year fees to premium subscribers. Salon has lost $57 million since March 1998; its stock is so low the company fears its shares may be delisted from the Nasdaq Stock Market as early as June.
With so much financial despair on the Web, sites should be wary of offering promotional discounts so steep that they sink into deeper financial trouble, warned Greg Ballard, CEO of MyFamily.com, which runs one of the Web's most successful subscription services.
``You have to have a sophisticated understanding of the subscription business to know what is working and what isn't,'' Ballard said. MyFamily.com says it has about 350,000 subscribers who pay $39.95 to $99 annually for access to the San Francisco-based company's U.S. Census and ancestry databases.
Only the online editions of The Wall Street Journal and Consumer Reports have more subscribers. About 574,000 subscribers pay $29 to $59 annually to read The Wall Street Journal's online edition. Consumer Reports has about 550,000 online subscribers who pay $19 to $47.40 annually.
Despite the success of these online publications, few traditional newspapers and magazines charge to read their Web editions, largely because so much online news coverage is available for free. So far, other news organizations' attempts to charge subscriptions _ from Slate.com to TheStreet.com _ have flopped.
That doesn't mean subscriptions won't work on the Web, asserts Martin Nisenholtz, CEO of New York Times Digital.
``We believe there are many things that people are willing to pay for on the Web. The question is how you structure the offers,'' Nisenholtz said.
The paper's online news archives and crossword have always cost money and Nisenholtz hopes to expand the Internet subscription base with a variety of premium services during the next six months. Most of the online edition will remain free to the New York Times' 15.7 million registered users.
The Rochester Post-Bulletin, a daily paper in Minnesota with a paid circulation of about 42,000, broke the mold beginning May 1 by imposing a $60 annual subscription on all online readers living outside its circulation area.
Readers residing within the circulation area must subscribe to the print version to read stories on the paper's Web site, which draws about 4,000 hits per day.
The change triggered hundreds of e-mails protesting the change, but the paper's management stood by the decision, reasoning that readers interested in Rochester, Minn. can't find better a better source than the coverage provided by Post-Bulletin's staff of 72 journalists. In the new regimen's first three days, 25 people signed up for online-only subscriptions, said Post-Bulletin Editor and General Manager Jon Losness
``We don't want to keep feeding this idea that our content has no value,'' said Losness. ``We are going to give this a whirl because the other model just doesn't work.''