Presbyterian panel votes to forbid gay unions
Sunday, July 2nd 2000, 12:00 am
By: News On 6
LONG BEACH, Calif. â€“ After an emotional debate about one of the most contentious issues embroiling some Protestant denominations, the top policy-making body of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) has moved the church one step closer to forbidding ministers to conduct same-sex unions.
The decision, which came on a close vote Friday to amend the church's constitution, will take effect next June if it is ratified by two-thirds of the church's regional jurisdictions.
Other major denominations also have addressed the same-sex debate in the last year. For example, two ministers in the larger United Methodist Church have faced church trials for violating a law of their denomination forbidding same-sex unions. Both were convicted; one was defrocked, and the other was suspended from his duties.
Approval of the amendment came on a 268-251 vote. It was among the final items of business at the denomination's General Assembly, which has been meeting in this Southern California city since June 22.
In the debate, supporters of the amendment described it as upholding a traditional Christian view of marriage. One church elder, Paula Metherell, a member of the presbytery in Long Beach, said "the duty of the church" was to serve as "a moral beacon," and call people to a life of holiness.
But opponents of the measure, such as George McCall of Missouri, argued that the amendment, if approved, would limit pastors' ability to minister effectively to all members of their congregations.
"Do not bind our conscience and tie our hands as pastors," Mr. McCall said.
Before the vote, the assembly narrowly defeated an alternative that would have called for a "spirit of dialogue" among Presbyterians and for the church to honor "the discretion of pastors" in caring for their congregations.
The denomination, with 2.6 million members in 11,400 congregations nationwide, represents one of the most historically influential streams of Protestantism in the United States.
The denomination's governing structure has significant parallels to that of the United States, with the Presbyterian assembly playing a role similar to that of Congress in passing constitutional amendments, which then must be ratified by the presbyteries, the regional jurisdictions that play a role similar to the states.
But in recent years, the denomination has become increasingly riled by issues centering on what rights are due its gay members. And division about same-sex unions was evident last week, among the commissioners, as Presbyterian delegates are called, on the committee that formulated the amendment.
On Tuesday, by a vote of 25-22, the committee approved a statement declaring, "Scripture and our confessions teach that God's intention for all people is to live either in fidelity within the covenant of marriage between a man and a woman or in chastity in singleness." The amendment adds that church officers may not bless same-sex unions, nor may church property be used for such purposes.
The amendment's wording is close to the law against same-sex unions adopted by the Methodists in 1996.
The vote Friday was not the first time Presbyterian leaders had attempted to legislate against same-sex unions. Six years ago, the assembly adopted a similar amendment, but it failed to win the approval of the needed majority of the presbyteries. In 1995, a similar effort failed to pass the assembly.
But since then, the denomination has seemed to lean in a more conservative direction. In 1996, the assembly approved an amendment barring the ordination of anyone sexually active outside the bounds of marriage, a move widely understood as aimed at preventing noncelibate gays and lesbians from serving as ministers, elders or deacons. It became church law the next year, after more than two-thirds of the presbyteries voted in its favor.
One of the organizations that supported that amendment was the Presbyterian Coalition. Its moderator, or top official, the Rev. Jerry Anderson of Glen Ellyn, Ill., said after Friday night's vote that there was "no room to gloat" for the amendment's supporters, because many Presbyterians who opposed the amendment were suffering "a lot of pain." Nevertheless, Mr. Anderson said he expected the amendment to be ratified overwhelmingly.
But one of the amendment's opponents, Mitzi Henderson, a Californian who serves as co-moderator of the More Light Presbyterian Churches, an organization that supports gay rights, said, "I don't think it's the end of the struggle."
Ms. Henderson said she did not agree that the amendment would be easily ratified.