Democrats Seek Higher Spending On Education, Health Care And National Security

Thursday, March 29th 2007, 10:35 am
By: News On 6

WASHINGTON (AP) _ A budget plan promising spending increases for education, health care and national security neared House passage Thursday as Democrats pressed their first budget plan since regaining control of Congress.

Meanwhile, Republicans regrouping from their loss of a majority in last year's election faced a difficult vote Thursday on whether to cut Medicare to help finance renewal of President Bush's 2001 and 2003 tax cuts.

The Democratic plan predicts a sizable surplus in five years, but only if Bush's tax cuts expire in 2010 as scheduled. Democrats said the $2.9 trillion plan for next year would point the way to a surplus after years of red ink under Bush and a GOP-controlled Congress.

Republicans said that $153 billion surplus in 2012 would appear only if tax cuts passed in 2001 and 2003 expire in four years _ amounting to the ``largest tax increase in American history.''

The future of the Bush tax cuts will likely be decided after the 2008 presidential election. While in the majority, congressional Republicans never held votes to make all of them permanent, despite Bush's annual calls to do so.

Under Congress' budget process, the annual budget resolution is a nonbinding outline that guides future legislation. It lets the two parties show voters their competing fiscal visions, often without having to take the politically difficult votes to implement them.

The Democratic budget blueprint calls for a nearly $25 billion increase next year for domestic programs popular with lawmakers in both parties, approving Bush's record budget increase for the Pentagon's non-war budget and $145 billion for operations in Iraq and Afghanistan next year.

Those spending boosts would cause the deficit to rise from $209 billion this year to $241 billion in 2009 before increased revenues from the expiration of the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts rapidly generate a surplus.

Republicans credit those tax cuts _ on income, investments, estates, married couples and families with children, among other things _ with reviving the economy from a recession early in Bush's first term.

Extending those tax cuts would cost about $250 billion in 2012 alone. Democrats acknowledge many of the provisions _ especially those aimed at middle-income taxpayers _ will be renewed.

``That decision will be taken when we reach it. When we have to cross that bridge, we'll cross that bridge,'' said House Budget Committee Chairman John Spratt Jr., D-S.C. ``We hope we'll have a surplus by that point in time.''

For now, the budget plan would require lawmakers seeking to cut taxes or boost benefit programs _ such as Medicare, children's health care or farm subsidies _ to ``pay for'' the changes with tax increases or offsetting spending cuts.

That rule would greatly complicate efforts later this year to boost funding for a popular health insurance program for poor children.

Democrats opted to put off politically painful decisions on shoring up the finances of Medicare and Social Security.

Republicans countered with an alternative plan cutting $279 billion from federal benefit programs such as Medicare and Medicaid over the next five years _ far greater cuts than proposed by Bush in February.

The plan, authored by Paul Ryan of Wisconsin, top Republican on the budget panel, would fully extend the 2001 and 2003 rounds of tax cuts, at a cost of about $450 billion. But Ryan's plan is certain to lose by a big margin Thursday.

Ryan warned his colleagues that the looming retirement of the Baby Boom generation threatens to swamp the budget because of the spiraling costs of Medicare and Social Security.

``If we don't get a handle on our fiscal situation, if we don't recognize the fact that if all we do is raise taxes to balance the budget in 2012, you're going to go right back into deficits soon thereafter if we don't control spending, if we don't reform government,'' Ryan said.

The Democratic budget also suffers from key flaws Democrats such as Spratt have seen in Bush's budgets.

Both plans fail to account for the long-term costs of overhauling the alternative minimum tax so it does not raises taxes on more than 20 million middle-class taxpayers.

And the Democratic plan mirrors Bush's request for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, which assumes no funding after 2009.